Hon. Monique Langhorne See Rating Details
Superior Court
Napa County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Please type what you see below:


What others have said about Hon. Monique Langhorne



Comment #: CA48355
Judge Langhorn should not be on the bench. She is totally unfit to adjudicate complex civil matters. She has an inability to grasp matters of law and fact and make a reasoned determination. Her decisions are flawed and will be over ruled. Her rulings have cost this litigant hundreds of thousands of dollars, because she didn't understand the issues, and made rulings that had no basis in law or fact. She should be removed from the bench.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA37999
[Redacted by Ed.] This judge actually allowed a man to be sentenced for a crime where there were ZERO WITNESSES and obvious that the local law enforcement set the guy up....she let this man lose his life to the system when all evidence showed that THERE WASNT EVEN A WITNESS TO A CRIME....MEANING SHE ALLOWED THE POLICE TO SET A MAN UP AND THEN ALLOWED THE COURT TO KEEP THE SENTENCE ON THE MAN. HORRIBLE JUDGE.