"The Robing Room: CA State Judges

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Jennifer R Gerard

Comments

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA41854
Rating:1.1

Comments:
This judge acts very abusive in the court room. She minimizes the severity of the matter at hand, she is extremely biased, rude, refuses to give both parties a fair hearing, she is showing her favoritism towards one party during hearing. Her biased ruling in Family court, without a sorrow review of the evidence hurt children. She will not even allow witnesses to testify on important matters regarding safety of the child. She makes inappropriate statements comparing the presented issues at hand with worst cases she dealt in the past, without even knowing the case. She makes mistakes when referring to reports because she doesnt pay attention to details. She has no idea about developmental abilities of children, shows incompetence by making inappropriate generalizations. This judge should not be allowed in the family court as she makes orders that compromise children's safety. She knows that she acts abusive and forces her biased opinion on parties. She violates the rights of parents. Someone needs to investigate her unprofessional conduct. Terrible judge.