"The Robing Room: CA State Judges

Hon. Carol A Greene	See Rating Details
Judge Superior Court
Riverside County	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 3.2 - 3 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: - 0 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Carol A Greene

Comments

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA52769
Rating:4.8

Comments:
the honorable Carol Green. is a bout what a judge should be, proper shaming of lawyer unwilling to do what their profession requires should be shammed and held accountable, that is the way it works.

However, there are issues that need to be rectified on impartial management of the bench, being a true administrator of judicial prudence at times one needs to review complaints and the law which guides those seeking remedy. the bench is of the people

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA48795
Rating:1.2

Comments:
170.6 her. She is awful, rude, disrespectful. She has ZERO clue about civil litigation - will refuse to continue cases even if no one is ready for trial. Her staff are utterly incompetent. Her clerk has neither the skill set nor the competence to be in a courtroom. They will reject filings because they don't like the category you picked. On the plus side - everything she does is basically grounds for an appeal.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA46261
Rating:3.6

Comments:
A screamer who doesn't know how to use Zoom. Talks over litigants (can't grasp the concept of a telephonic delay) and then tells them she'll sanction them for talking over her. Threatens because she is threatened due to her lack of intellectual candlepower.