Hon. Robin Wolfe See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Tulare County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   10.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 5 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Robin Wolfe


Comments


Other

Comment #: CA48958
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Biased judge. Denies restraining orders against fathers who have harassed the mother repeatedly. Doesn't let mothers speak in court, but gives fathers multiple opportunities to speak. Grants hearings when the mother was never served, doesn't let the mother submit any evidence. Threatens mothers to get them to agree to the orders she wants. Completely unfair, biased and one sided towards men. States untrue arguments as reasons for her rulings. Completely unprofessional and should not be allowed to serve as a judge, period.

Other

Comment #: CA48957
Rating:1.0
Comments:
bias

Other

Comment #: CA48939
Rating:1.0
Comments:
A family law judge that doesn’t seem to care about what’s truly best for children. She is intimidating in the court room when unnecessary and makes decisions to favor absent fathers. How can you have faith in a judicial system that is in place to support your children and do what’s best for them, but yet seems to fail them instead?

Other

Comment #: CA48936
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Terrible judge. She slaps absent fathers on the wrist while treating the mothers who have sacrificed everything for the children like they are criminals. Biased and unjust. She compares children to toothbrushes and is a complete disgrace to our judicial system. Disgrace of a human to represent anyone’s children. She doesn’t allow mothers to speak and just sides with fathers. Absolute disgrace and unjust woman.

Other

Comment #: CA48427
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Biased judge who sides with men and forces mothers to pay for half the counseling costs even though father has been absent. Father's get a slap on the hand and mothers are accused of manipulating children for fathers absence. Very unfair judge.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA36552
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Tough but fair