Hon. Eric C. Taylor See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Eric C. Taylor


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA29360
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Taylor has been put on notice repeatedly about how rarely the law is followed in the LASC Family Courts, specifically by monsters like Commissioner Glenda Veasey of the Torrance Courthouse Department J, about whom Judge Taylor has received scores of complaints. Instead of doing anything to salvage the faith in our legal system of the Family Court's Victims, he allows the complaints to be ignored.
Veasey is an ogre who thinks nothing of violating basic constitutional rights.
On October 3, 2019, Veasey violated my due process rights and issued an order that has no basis in California law. That Veasey did these things has already been determined after a subsequent motion for reconsideration hearing by a different judge.
The Minute Order from the October 3 hearing says that my ex-wife was present for the hearing and that it was a hearing. Regardless, after taking 137 days to conduct an "investigation", despite Veasey having violated the Constitutions of the U.S. and California, despite Veasey having issuing an unlawful order, and despite the Record explicitly saying it was a hearing at which only my ex-wife was present, Judge Taylor's designee to investigate the complaint decided that my ex-wife wasn't present and that it wasn't a hearing. He said that it was against Veasey's long-standing practice to hold ex parte hearings with one of the parties in her chambers. In so deciding, Taylor's designee implied that it is the custom and practice of Glenda Veasey to violate the 5th and 14th Amendments of the US Constitution and Article 1 ยง 7 of the California Constitution, and it is the custom and practice of Glenda Veasey to issue unlawful orders. The judicial officers of the LASC Family Courts are tyrants who freely violate the law with impunity because Judge Taylor allows it to continue.