Hon. Pamela A Davis See Rating Details
Commissioner
Superior Court
Alameda County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Pamela A Davis


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA53269
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Starting w/ this Reuters article- https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-judges-misconduct/

I rate her Zero.....

Judge Pamela A Davies is not a good judge handling the small court claims, when comes to handle complex trials she said, :"you will get something in email" and then she side corner all the great evidence presented and always takes sides of the govt functionaries who are being sued as part of Tort claims. Seems like saving her seat to not fight with the govt and to be always on there side, she forgets that she is the referee and not a govt agent sitting on the Judicial bench.
My recommendation for this Judicial Officer to go through this article and self contain her to being more effective and articulate her Knowledge on the subject/matter(s)- https://reyabogado.com/us/what-makes-a-bad-judge/

Let the data speaks for itself for the Los Angeles County-
https://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-judges-discipline-20150404-story.html
https://laist.com/news/politics/2024-election-california-primary-los-angeles-county-superior-court-judge-write-in-candidate-lacba-ratings-bias
A concerned Lawyer.....

Litigant

Comment #: CA52116
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
If this is the same judge that is currently at the Beverly Hills courthouse (as of 12-1-23), she is horrible. I walked into the courtroom and saw a 70 year old woman with horrendous plastic surgery to her face (one too many plastic surgeries). This judge did not read the evidence. She failed to rule in my favor, following a loan I made to a defendant who flunked out of Tucson medical school, who even went so far as to claim that her medical school professor at University of Arizona in Tucson sexually harassed her (she was hoping to use this as an excuse to explain to her committee why she was not passing her classes). The defendant was flunking out of medical school many months prior to the alleged sexual harassment of her professor. Thank God she never graduated from medical school. I am sure that the medical school quietly escorted her out the back door after realizing what a psychopath she is. Additionally, I informed this silicon-infused judge that the defendant was seeing a therapist and on medication, and that she was a liar. However, my claim was denied with NO legal explanation. The defendant eventually found herself a different sucker that fell for her trap and she is currently engaged to this kid. Little does he know what he has gotten himself into. I so fortunate that I declined the defendants advances to be more than just friends. I dodged a bullet there but I did loose a significant amount of money.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA49366
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I was this bench officers bailiff at Santa Monica Court when she was in Dept B “Traffic”. Her and her judicial assistant are two terrible and evil people. The Commissioner had me removed from the courtroom because I would not allow her j/a to be rude and disrespectful to me. I had to put her in check in front of the commissioner. Then the commissioner went home and told her husband what happened and he recommended I be kicked out of the courtroom and she came back and did it. She’s fake and not a good person. I’m retired not! Haha

Harris