Hon. Ebrahim Baytieh See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Orange County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   5.2 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Ebrahim Baytieh


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA53361
Rating:9.4
Comments:
Judge Baytieh is a smart, even-handed, hardworking judge. He fairly considers the arguments and evidence and is not biased. Although I haven't always liked his rulings, they have always been well-founded.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA51985
Rating:1.0
Comments:
He was fired as a DA for prejudice statements.

Other

Comment #: CA51984
Rating:1.0
Comments:
HAS NOT FOLLOWED THE RULES OF COURT IN PROBATE CASES. PUTTING OLD LADIES OUT OF THEIR HOMES AND LEAVING THEM HOMELESS, DIVISTATING OLD LADIES THAT CANNOT PROTECT THEMSELVES. PROBATE COURT WAS DESIGNED TO PROTECT THE SURVIVING SPOUSE AND THE KEEP THE SURVIVING SPOUSE IN THEIR HOME. HE IS IN CHARGE OF THE CARES ACT AND IS NOT ACTING IN THE BEST INTEREST OF SOCIETY.
TAKING SURVIVING SPOUSE HOMES FROM THEM AND FORCING THESE OLD LADIES ON TO THE STREETS. LEAVING THEM HOMELESS AND DEVASTATED.

Other

Comment #: CA51983
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN VOTED IN AS A JUDGE FOR PROBATE COURT DOES NOT KNOW THE PROBATE LAWS AND IS NOT FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURES OF PROBATE COURT. PROBATE COURT WAS DESIGNED TO PROTECT THE SURVIVING SPOUSE AND TO KEEP THE SURVIVING SPOUSE IN THEIR HOME. *PUTTING OLD LADIES ON THE STREETS AND TAKING AWAY THEIR HOMES. HE IS IN CHARGE OF THE CARE ACT AND IS DOING THE OPPOSITE OF THAT. COMPLETELY WRONG IS NOT FOLLOWING THE LAWS OF PROBATE COURT PUTTING OLD LADIES OUT OF THEIR HOMES. LEAVING OLD LADIES HOMELESS. HE WAS FIRED AS A DA FOR PREJUDICE STATEMENTS.

Litigant

Comment #: CA48909
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Filing for motion for disqualification probably says it all.