Hon. Lynn Duryee See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Marin County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.0 - 4 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Lynn Duryee


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA2220
Rating:3.4
Comments:
untrustworthy. went into settlement discussions with her. she was very involved. at one point, it seemed we were close to settling. she asked us privately what was out 'bottom line number', which she shared with her, privately by agreement. minutes later she came back, after telling our number to the other side. she chastised us for not wanting to settle for less, threatening to withhold mandatory attorneys fees if we took it to trial in front of her. her desire to reduce her workload is greater than her desire for justice and integrity. never again will I trust her, ever.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA1227
Rating:3.0
Comments:
Very condescending to both parties and counsel. Sorry if it's an inconvenience for Your Honor to actually hear a matter on calendar. Newsflash, a landlord doesn't really want to have an unlawful detainer trial either but when the tenant refuses to move out or settle, we don't really have a choice, do we? Seems to be more interested in climbing the ladder than doing her job.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA604
Rating:4.5
Comments:
Not the most pleasant judge to deal with.