Hon. Corey Scott Cramin See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Orange County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   5.0 - 6 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Corey Scott Cramin


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA5316
Rating:1.0
Comments:
There's very good reason that he's stuck in "limited civil" -- the tiny cases. Because he does not have the respect of his colleagues on the bench. There are good reasons for that.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA5314
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Is buddy-buddy with certain attorneys who appear regularly in his courtroom. When those attorneys appear, whatever they claim, they get. The judge acts as their advocate, not as a judge at all, no matter the facts or the law. BEWARE THIS JUDGE!!!! Will be dinged henceforth and here forward in all cases. He is a serious problem for the bench.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4890
Rating:9.6
Comments:
He is a great judge.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4781
Rating:8.1
Comments:
I saw him recently. He is a good civil judge, who reads the cases and the papers.

Litigant

Comment #: CA4754
Rating:1.0
Comments:
He is not a proper judge. He is a landlord himself, who rules however he feels (and he always sides with the landlord), disregarding procedure, law, evidence and testimony. He is rude and condescending, and does not deserve to be on the bench.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA1926
Rating:1.0
Comments:
He has been banished to the nether regions for good reason. He is horrible.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA1341
Rating:9.5
Comments:
Judge Cramin is an excellent civil judge, who I have experienced both at Central Santa Ana and Laguna Hills courthouses. He is sharp on civil issues and reads cases--a real plus. Don't know why he is in Laguna Hills. A keeper.