Hon. W. Michael Hayes See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Orange County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   10.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. W. Michael Hayes


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA8063
Rating:10.0
Comments:
I was very impressed with Judge Hayes. He was diligent about reported sidebars, which is SO important and which too many judges neglect or refuse. He saw through D.A. subterfuge and handled it like the expert he is. (My DA asked to be able to have a witness testify that while she was off the stand overnight, she got telephone calls that "scared her" and she thought they were from my client.
Judge Hayes questioned and realized the witness had NOT answered the calls, and had no idea where they were from, or who they were from.
Hayes is a former officer of he law -- he demanded the DA's office to find out since the number had come up on the witness's caller ID.
It was a county insurance salesperson, and had NO connection to my client.
The DA tried to have the news reporter removed from the trial because he wrote that from opening statements he foresaw an acquittal, and he listed some facts that the DA said were made up.
In fact those facts were listed in the federal filings about the same incident, and were FACTS. The reporter was more up on the case than the DA.
After the case was over, her office had the young reporter fired from the local paper.
Hayes did not play the BS game --
HE was kind to jurors, never let it seem he had a care which side prevailed, and made his rulings on the law - without any bias.
When it came time for the verdict, the alternates requested to stand in the box with the '12' - to deliver the verdict... a full acquittal. Very fair trial. Couldn't ask for more.