Hon. Eugene S. Gini, Jr. See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Placer County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   5.6 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 4 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Eugene S. Gini, Jr.


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA28552
Rating:1.1
Comments:
He is not a good judge. He does nothing to improve himself. He does not think about the issues and does not take the time to research the issues. He has minimal and poor scholarship. He consistently fails to maintain an evenhanded approach. He always follows the DA position. He is not a fair and independent jurist who will carefully analyze the legal issues and make a proper ruling based on the facts and the law. He does not adhere to that standard. He is more worried about how he will not disappoint and infuriate the DA Office. He is very indecisive and will always rule in favor of the DA. He can be a better judge but he is complacent. The community deserves a judge who will do the right thing and not worry how the public will view him. It is unfortunate. He is not a bad person. He is actually a nice man.

Other

Comment #: CA22212
Rating:1.0
Comments:
AnotherJudge who is biased towards men in any RO violation case. Any lie by a woman is believed and the result is unfair treatment and another loss of savings to cover the remanded in court bail for someone with zero records of violence and a clean record before the divorce started. He fails to read the situation and if he gets a letter thats a lie ...He buys into it ... that spells doom for the defendant husbands of Placer County ... Bias runs rampant

Other

Comment #: CA22211
Rating:1.0
Comments:
AnotherJudge who is biased towards men in any RO violation case. Any lie by a woman is believed and the result is unfair treatment and another loss of savings to cover the remanded in court bail for someone with zero records of violence and a clean record before the divorce started. He fails to read the situation and if he gets a letter thats a lie ...He buys into it ... that spells doom for the defendant husbands of Placer County ... Bias runs rampant

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA14197
Rating:10.0
Comments:
I never met the Judge but he wrote something that leads me to believe he has something the rest don't - integrity.

Other

Comment #: CA13916
Rating:1.0
Comments:
this is not a man ...he is the devil himself

Other

Comment #: CA10398
Rating:2.0
Comments:
He doesn't seem to listen to defense attorney, puts more weight to District Attorney, when accused has no history of violence, misreads information given to him to a poor outcome for accused or defendant! Also, seems detached for request for reasonable bail amounts!