Hon. Thomas H. Cahraman See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Riverside County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   10.0 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   3.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Thomas H. Cahraman


Comments


Other

Comment #: CA9973
Rating:3.0
Comments:
I am appalled by Judge Thomas Cahraman. He should not be the Judge assigned to Probate overseeing Guardian & Conservatorships. I sat in court today a friend of women who's family was seeking Conservatorship of her due to a serious medical condition. Before the case was heard I watched and cringed as he spoke to family members of other cases. Just plain rude. Someone needs to monitor Cahramans actions and see how he treats people in his court room. Long winded, wants to be the attorney and the judge in the room. I watched case after case where this judge denied able bodied family members from managing their love ones affairs and money, instead assigning it over the the Public Guardian's office. Each time informing the Conservatee and their family that it would only cost them a few hundred dollars a month a month from their assets to have the county manage their money. This is crazy when you have family members that are willing to do this for free. I just wonder hope much of the Public Guardian's monthly income is derived from Judge Carhaman's assignments. After 2 1/2 hours in the courtroom today I just could not believe the injustice I witnessed.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA8242
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Very, very wise. A superb and conscientious judge. Treats people with firmness but respect. He thinks out loud - which is a big plus - but as he talks out loud deliberating on the bench he playing devil's advocate back and forth which is very insightful, but it can lead to misunderstandings by some unsophisticated litigants who don't appreciate hearing commentary that goes against them and might misconstrue it as providing unfair advocacy for the other team.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA7984
Rating:10.0
Comments:
This scholarly gentleman is a model judge.