Hon. Frederick Paul Dickerson III See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Riverside County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.3 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Frederick Paul Dickerson III


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA27312
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Did not look at me did not want to hear from me my son was falsely accused of street racing with brain injury the Da presented to the jurors that he caused brain injury the friend had some bruising around the brain he and the other friend went on to college to play basketball one in the pros now the college they all said the same story they was cut off the video support there story the they still proceeded with trial and in the middle of trial with a new judge the jury was dismissed my son and his 2 friends statement are missing from the report we will be protesting on the 29 for The FA to drop this racial profile case very very bad judge

Other

Comment #: CA27309
Rating:1.0
Comments:
He did not make eye contact because he was rushing a case to trial without listening to a black woman and Asian man. When the case went forward, the jury that was picked was dismissed and before that the public defender was relieved of duty. Bad judge.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA14760
Rating:1.9
Comments:
Does nopt know all the rules in divorce proceedings when being brought back for alimony modifications.. a man does not have to work 70 hours a week to pay a women to sit on her but and not get a job fulltime.. no kids... man brings home 1000 for two weeks women brings home 1200 for two weeks but no change of cercum stance its BS..
He needs to here the full case and get updated that a man can only and opnly per cal law work a 40 hr work week not 70 to pay alimony

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA55
Rating:4.0
Comments:
Appallingly pro-prosecution; neutrality is not part of his personal lexicon.