Hon. Frederick Paul Dickerson III See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Riverside County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.9 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Frederick Paul Dickerson III


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA14760
Rating:1.9
Comments:
Does nopt know all the rules in divorce proceedings when being brought back for alimony modifications.. a man does not have to work 70 hours a week to pay a women to sit on her but and not get a job fulltime.. no kids... man brings home 1000 for two weeks women brings home 1200 for two weeks but no change of cercum stance its BS..
He needs to here the full case and get updated that a man can only and opnly per cal law work a 40 hr work week not 70 to pay alimony

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA55
Rating:4.0
Comments:
Appallingly pro-prosecution; neutrality is not part of his personal lexicon.