Hon. Russell L. Hom See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Sacramento County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.6 - 6 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Russell L. Hom


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA7474
Rating:9.1
Comments:
I had him as a trial judge. He was pleasant and courteous, giving me latitude with vior dire. My guy was acquitted of the main charge for which the offer was 2 years s/p, but convicted of the lesser-included misto and Hom really hammered him on it at sentencing (no AWP), which I felt in doing so he wrongly incorporated factors in aggravation of which my guy was acquitted. At the SCR level, he doesn't seem to want to make waves with the DA and propose a court offer that significantly differs. However, he does listen and he will give you some traction downward in the offer if you're prepared and have good reasons for the reduction. Overall, I'm glad he's on the bench as there are FAR worse judges out there for the defense.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA6931
Rating:5.1
Comments:
Not the worse judge on the bench but definitely pro prosecution. Hard to believe he was a defense attorney before ascending to the bench. Easy going and pleasant enough, but you will not get any breaks in his courtroom as a criminal defendant.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA426
Rating:4.2
Comments:
A prosecutor's judge.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA246
Rating:4.5
Comments:
With such a temperament and a work ethic one would assume those talents could foster more creativity to listen or consider any argument toward resolution of cases presented by defense. D.A.'s run the show. A D.A. in a robe, but very plesent in the process.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA187
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Hom is very smart. He is a very capable trial judge, and he really knows the law. He also is very pleasant and courteous. But he is averse to crossing the DA, so look for your plea bargains elsewhere.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA178
Rating:2.9
Comments:
Spineless. The cost to taxpayers because of the current state of the bench, is enormous. There is no separation of powers, so D.A.'s run rampant - overcharging cases in order to extort pleas to lesser crimes - and insisting on prison commitments for the bargain. This occurs even in the cases where the clients are innocent. Do you know how much money you are spending in order to house a state prisoner who has been sent there for petty crimes, such as petty theft with a petty theft prior (Penal Code 666)? You can thank judicial officers like Hom because he lacks the courage to wear his robe with integrity and wisdom.