Hon. Keith D. Davis See Rating Details
Superior Court
San Bernardino County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.1 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

What others have said about Hon. Keith D. Davis


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA8065
I have no clue how this man got on the bench, but I have heard stories that it had nothing to do with ability or intellect and that appears to be true from my experience. This man actually made a comment that he "never met an innocent defendant" --
and held a young man to answer for a strike offense, criminal threat, for saying "If you make my mother ill over this, I will take you to court." The same case, he found that one person not liking the way my client trimmed his neighbors trees, meant my client should be held to answer for FELONY VANDALISM (the homeowner did not complain... the future power of attorney did.)
I also did the appeal of a case over which he presided in trial. He is dangerous, arrogant and doesn't belong on a judicial bench.
He is not short on spouting opinions about things he knows nothing about. I'm sorry to hear he is still on the bench... I haven't seen him in a while.