Hon. Janet M. Frangie See Rating Details
Superior Court
San Bernardino County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   5.0 - 5 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Please type what you see below:


What others have said about Hon. Janet M. Frangie



Comment #: CA27055
Judge Frangie is a disgrace to the bench. She seems to buy into the pro-criminal mentality that has spread across California and routinely rules in ways that put dangerous criminals back on the streets. She seems to go into cases having predetermined the result she wants.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA25068
An exceptionally able judge.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA16379
A disgrace to the bench. Not familiar with case details. Failure to distinguish case law precedent and apply them as required. Extremely pro corporate parties. Makes disparaging remarks frequently.


Comment #: CA6631
Judge Frangie appears to be a racist, bias against african american's in her courtroom, beware because you wont recieve a fair trial.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4187
Judge Frangie was excellent as a trial judge. Fair to both sides, flexible, but wants to keep things moving, which is great. She will do her own research on particular issues in order to get the correct ruling. She lets the lawyers try their case. She isn't afraid to change her mind on a limine ruling after seeing how the trial is progressing. She is everything that one could ask for in a trial judge.


Comment #: CA1598
Rating:Not Rated
Treats people with dgnity and respect.