Hon. Raymond L. Haight III See Rating Details
Superior Court
San Bernardino County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Please type what you see below:


What others have said about Hon. Raymond L. Haight III


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA12755
Raymond Haight disseminates fraudulent reports, defaming domestic violence victims to a police department and has instructed the relevant police office, who was summonsed to his home in Redlands not to appear in court. This police officer was provided with a packet of "documents" which cannot be legally authenticated. His conduct is witness intimidation and coercion. He failed to notify the relevant agency of the fraudulent reports that were provided to him and refused to notify law enforcement of the electronic stalking and harassment that he is aware of centered around domestic violence victims. Instead he perpetuates third party defamation around false reports to harass, intimidate and coerce, failing to act according to Judicious canon of ethics. A judge is not allowed to conduct himself in this manner and has to adhere to the law. His conduct does not inspire public confidence in the ability of the judiciary to apply the law according to Judicial canon of ethics canon 1, 2, 3, 6.


Comment #: CA11188
Rating:Not Rated
Judge Haight does not have the temperament to be a judicial officer and does not act in a calm and rational manner; displaying a hysterical tendency when addressing family law matters. This judicial officer refuses to address the relevant family law standard and bases his decisions on matters that are not before the court. This judge is fixated, rigid and is incapable of displaying an open mind and does not have the temperament to act as a judicial officer. His term as presiding judge will come to an end in December 2017. To date this Presiding Judge has not implemented any procedures or a domestic violence protocol as required by the CA judicial council, preferring instead to increase and expose children to additional domestic violence, since it's his way or the highway.