Hon. J. David Mazurek See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
San Bernardino County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.4 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. J. David Mazurek


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA10777
Rating:2.4
Comments:
Judge Mazurek has no problem making jokes about witnesses committing perjury allowing his DA to present false allegations of a serious crime with no evidence against the other defendant but the DA uses it as fact makes his own opinion the only opinion the jury can accept not allowing defense witnesses to testify stating they have wasted enough of the people's time making statements about who he feels committed the crime and sentencing that 23 year old to 39 to life for crimes he did not commit stating that the witness will change her story while on the stand laughing about it playing games with people's life's he is a disgrace to the bench and arrogant and completely complicit with false allegations allowing two defendants to testify against a thrid making a detective with credibility issues an expert witness in gang evidence and cell phone tower pings both of which the detective is ignorant

Other

Comment #: CA7801
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
pathetic example of a judge. piss poor at best.

Other

Comment #: CA6353
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This Judge routinely disregaurds the case facts, evidence, and allows known false testimony to convict factually innocent 23 year old man to 70 plus years and 2 life terms. All with out admissible evidence. And violates family members rights in visiting audience. And, worse. [redacted by Ed.]