Hon. Michael A. Sachs See Rating Details
Superior Court
San Bernardino County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Please type what you see below:


What others have said about Hon. Michael A. Sachs



Comment #: CA13168
The Assistant Presiding Judge of the San Bernardino Superior Court harasses single mothers and violates CA penal code 646.9 and CA penal code 502. He contacts the clients of single mother and floods them with documents that allegedly originate from a court of law, attempting to destroy the income of a single mother. He has previously verbally abused the same mother and harasses and stalks her on a daily basis. This abusive conduct violates all applicable judicial canon of ethics and displays that he does not have any judicial temperament as he is commenting on alleged court proceedings, again violating the judicial canon of ethics. He disseminates court records blaming the single mother for the amount owed when in fact the ex-husband owes the entire amount admitted in various transcripts. There is not a single purpose for this baseless, highly abusive conduct but harassment and stalking and to cause emotional distress via an electronic stalking device called Prism. None of the records that he floods people with are authenticated and the only purpose is baseless vindictive harassment of clients and the single mother, who according to the state of mind of Michael Nash is entitled to be abused by obscene and vindictive conduct. He abuses the single mother with claims which she has already received a defamation award for.