Hon. Laura H. Parsky See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
San Diego County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.5 - 4 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Laura H. Parsky


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA23131
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge has the worst temperament. She shocks her staff with her presentation. She’s a loser, nasty, an has an ugly personality. I can’t comment on her appearance because she is not memorable.

She does not belong on the bench. I would write to the presiding judge and judicial council, if I was assured there would be no retaliation.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA17013
Rating:1.0
Comments:
the order was given she complies with conspiracy.kept anyone out of court denied anyone who could help sussman. sees evidence that is kept from one party, denies due process. so gave the order.she also conspires when ordered to. no tape of course no court reporter. three respondents attorney. plaintiff alone. incredible . her dad got her on the bench.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA13271
Rating:2.8
Comments:
She is an advocate for non-appearing defendants, finds spurious reasons not to grant uncontested motions, and a legal nit-picker that continually sacrifices substance for form. Makes up busy work for attorneys rather that administering justice.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA6918
Rating:1.0
Comments:
someone needs to find out how this woman got on the bench. The stories rumored are her parents bought it for her... I cannot imagine any OTHER way it could have happened. She takes nasty and stupid to new realms.