Hon. Ronald L. Styn See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
San Diego County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   6.6 - 7 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Ronald L. Styn


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA17167
Rating:3.1
Comments:
He is the worst judge I have ever had the misfortune of appearing in front of. He decides issues without reading the case law or evaluating the issues. If he decided he does not like you then he does everything he can to ensure you lose. He is awful. He is the essence of where our system goes wrong because he does not do justice. He does what he wants and that is not justice.

Litigant

Comment #: CA14663
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge seems apt to snap decisions without fully inquiring, exploring or allowing both sides to present argument. He was confused about the facts, and rather than seek clarity said "we don't have time" and made a snap decision. The Plaintiff's attorney had to interrupt the judge after he had made a decision in order to get the judge to reconsider the decision made.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA11834
Rating:2.6
Comments:
Dithering idiot who does not seem to know the law, and who openly expresses personal opinions about the parties and the facts. He needs to retire NOW.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA11218
Rating:10.0
Comments:
I have won cases and lost cases. He is thoughtful and fair.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA10550
Rating:2.3
Comments:
Styn used to be a good judge. Now he's just cranky and makes snap rulings without considering or listening to the full facts. .6

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA10452
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Fair and friendly judge for stipulation agreement. Is not bias and generally like when parties work it out on their own without going to trial.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA7073
Rating:9.5
Comments:
Look up "judicial temperment" in the dictionary and you'll find a picture of Judge Styn

Other

Comment #: CA4783
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Styn is the worst judge that I have ever encountered. He allowed his personal (and entirely unfounded) animus towards me to stipulate that I would never be allowed to testify in his court room. In doing so, he denied a severely injured plaintiff a relevant witness.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA2181
Rating:9.0
Comments:
One of the best judges in San Diego civil. Smart guy, fair, even-handed.