Hon. Ronald Evans Quidachay See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
San Francisco County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.2 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   2.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Ronald Evans Quidachay


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA3099
Rating:1.3
Comments:
His is not a good judge. He makes decisions off the cuff and then changes his mind based on an irrelevant detail. He demeanor is very poor. He is flip and rude to litigants and attorneys. He gives the legal profession a very bad name.

Litigant

Comment #: CA3096
Rating:2.0
Comments:
Unfair and unreasonable. First he held in my favor, then lawyer on the other side said things about me that had nothing to do with the case and had no relevance to the issue at hand, and he changed his mind and ruled against me. His demeanor was rude, abrupt, unprofessional. I thought he was a court staff person, like a bailiff when I few walked in because he seems like he has only a high school education. He's not a good judge.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA360
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Used to be the judge handling half of Law & Motion. Fair, good rulings. Reads the papers and asks good questions. Gives plaintiffs and defendants a fair shake. Generally tends to err on the side of letting pleadings through initial demurrers and motion stages. Good sense of humor.