Hon. Elizabeth Humphreys See Rating Details
Superior Court
San Joaquin County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.9 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Please type what you see below:


What others have said about Hon. Elizabeth Humphreys


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA32555
This judge made promises she refused to deliver on, causing great harm. This judge is 100% ignorant of the law, and makes rash decisions. This judge is unnecessarily unfair and harmful, never considering how much harm she has created by her unfair rulings and long delays.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA25836
This judge is a former senior partner at Kroloff law firm, and her personal lawyer is Chris Engh, and, still, she refuses to recuse herself when a case comes before her which involves the malpractice of Chris Engh and Kroloff law firm. The judicial canons and a respect for the law mean absolutely nothing to this unfair, unjust, biased and malicious judge who delights in harming innocent litigants in favor of her pets, the Kroloff lawyers. What a travesty of justice will be found unless you CCP Section 170.6 this awful, awful judge from the beginning. She will not recuse herself despite the absence of any fairness or impartiality. Disgraceful!!!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA12099
Judge Humphreys proved to be a careful, disciplined judge in a lengthy trial. She is precise on evidentiary issues, follows the law, and is business-like but in a nice manner. She also does mandatory settlement conferences herself unless there is an objection. On law and motion matters, she reads the cases in making rulings. She is very even handed.