Hon. Ginger E. Garrett See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
San Luis Obispo County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.1 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   10.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Ginger E. Garrett


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA6516
Rating:1.1
Comments:
This judge told the privately hired criminal defense attorney and the prosecutor in her chambers that she knew the defendant was guilty and that her jury would know she was guilty. When the case was transferred to a different courtroom on the day of trial because of another trial being scheduled for the same day, this judge saw to it through the pull of professional courtesy that her colleague would also see to it that her jurors knew the defendant was guilty. funny thing was, the defendant was not guilty. Always think critically about what you "know" when it concerns your judgment of others, especially when you have the power to change a life in drastic measure for better or worse.

Litigant

Comment #: CA4090
Rating:10.0
Comments:
This judge seems to have a rare combination of humanity and empathy. Don't get me wrong, she is no pushover, but she gives a bad choice appropriate brevity. If you happen to be in front of her for the 99th time...long gaze into your eyes, deep sigh and an almost imperceptible shake of her head. As if to say: "You know & I know that it's time for either a break from your crazy, or your death will surely come soon." Then she will cheerfully sentence you to prison. Calling out "See you next time!" as you shuffle back to holding.