Hon. Robert D. Foiles See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
San Mateo County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   5.4 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Robert D. Foiles


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA5300
Rating:3.4
Comments:
A newer judge who is desperately trying to join the small clique of judges who run the courts from behind the scene in San Mateo County.

Litigant

Comment #: CA4543
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This morning, I had Judge Foiles, to determine whether a temporary restraining order that he signed into effect on 10/25/13 against an individual harassing me and my family would become permanent. The order was officially and directly served to the person to be restrained, that same day. The same party then violated said restraining order on three separate occasions afterwards, and local police officers investigated each time, obtaining documented evidence to warrant immediate arrest, which apparently never occurred. The restrained party did not even appear in court this morning, but this judge was so unreasonable to me -- he did not allow me to answer anything at length, while, nitpicking at me on superfluous matters, and I never even got to mention that the restrained person was a sexual pervert with an apparent interest in my six-year old daughter, as left on a recorded message on our home phone and re-recorded by the police officers. Unable to afford an attorney, I could not seem to answer the nitpicking questions fast or properly enough for this judge, and he suddenly ended up dismissing the case, without even hearing about the pedophile aspects of the subject of the restraining order. If this is how our courts and judges operate nowadays, we no longer have any hope for any fair and equitable justice to be dispensed by such so-called "judges" of the law. My appearance today was not about me and my problem, it was all about Judge Foiles. May God have mercy on us, because this self-absorbed twit certainly will not. What outraged me the most was that Judge Foiles's original signed temporary restraining order was not worth the paper that it was written on. It only took me five hours of my time initially to obtain, and its stipulations and requirements were violated with impunity. Why even bother to get such an order, when our courts are run by judges like this?

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA4182
Rating:9.6
Comments:
Could not ask for more from a judge. A great guy, even when he rules against you (he was right, too!).