Hon. Mary Ann Grilli See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Santa Clara County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.0 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   3.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Mary Ann Grilli


Comments


Other

Comment #: CA7036
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This Judge is corrupt, unethical, dishonest and very abusive towards children and families to drain money out families and keep children in conflict to derive more money for children. She is very moody but always looking at worst-interest of children and best-interest of lawyers, evaluators, and court affiliates. Found numerous stories dated back to 1996. This judge is dirty and needs to be thrown out of office.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA6791
Rating:1.7
Comments:
This judge has been terrorizing women , professional women, in Santa Clara County for decades. She violates women and children's rights as a matter of routine and she protects fathers who commit fraud and misconduct in a manner that is criminal. In My case she knew father had not seen or paid the expenses of his child for a year, and she did nothing. In my case she knew father stole $1,000,000 from community businesses he locked me out of , earned over a 20 year marriage and she allowed him to do that for over two years, dividing nothing and letting father keep it all and not support his kid. She awarded no sanctions against father. If parties are both self reprensted she is somewhat fair. If a man is represented by Mr Baugh , or she appoints Mr Baugh as minor's counsel, there is nothing fair for the mother in the case, She is bought and paid for by kickbacks to Mr Baugh, Heather Allan and others she awards sanctions and assignments to. She stripped women of custody and property as a mater of routine. She is reported by all the family law lawyers to be having medical issues, early signs of dementia and may be addicted to pain medication. She is a menace to women and children. She is a disgrace to the female gender and a perfect example of why Affirmative Action was a bad idea.

Other

Comment #: CA5011
Rating:1.0
Comments:
The most biased judge I have ever seen

Other

Comment #: CA4405
Rating:9.0
Comments:
Judge Grilli looks deeply into all complaints,especially when they involve children. She knows the law , and truly has empathy for both sides of a case. What more can you ask?

Litigant

Comment #: CA3555
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
To perserve justice, Judge Mary Ann Grilli should be replaced by a lie detector.

Other

Comment #: CA3539
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
very biased judge

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA3429
Rating:2.4
Comments:
favors wealthy side