Hon. Cynda Riggins Unger
Judge
Superior Court
Solano County


Rate a judge
Attorney Average Rating:   3.7 - 12 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 42 rating(s)


General Rating Criteria

* Temp. Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Sch. Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Indu. Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Comp. Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punct. Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* Ab-Pr. General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* Ab-Tr. General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flex Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
    

Criminal Case Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Ev-Cr. Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Bail General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Plea Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
Inc.-Pr. General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
Inc.-Tr. General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
Inc.-S. General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Case Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Ev-Cv. Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Settle Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
Inc. General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
    
  

General Rating Criteria

Criminal Case Rating Criteria
(if applicable)

Civil Case Rating Criteria
(if applicable)

EvaluatorIDDate*Temp.*Sch.*Indu.*Comp.*Punct.*Ab-Pr.*Ab-Tr.Flex
Criminal Defense Lawyer2964709/23/2014        
Criminal Defense Lawyer2960509/21/2014        
Criminal Defense Lawyer2960209/21/20146  9  910
Criminal Defense Lawyer2930709/07/201411111111
Civil Litigation - Private2748106/16/20141       
Criminal Defense Lawyer2747806/16/2014110   101 
Criminal Defense Lawyer2641404/08/20141  1 11 
Civil Litigation - Private2639404/07/201416666115
Criminal Defense Lawyer2638104/07/2014        
Criminal Defense Lawyer2486001/10/201411113111
Civil Litigation - Private2404011/04/201338979317
Civil Litigation - Private2346409/27/2013810101010101010
Criminal Defense Lawyer2312008/31/201311112111
Civil Litigation - Private2274808/12/201328810109105
Criminal Defense Lawyer1779410/02/20121211 11 
Category Average  2.35.24.64.75.93.83.45.0
   
ID*Ev-Cr.BailPleaInc.-Pr.Inc.-Tr.Inc.-S.
29647      
29605      
29602      
29307      
274811     
27478      
26414      
26394      
26381      
24860111111
24040      
2346410  101010
23120      
22748      
17794      
 4.01.01.05.55.55.5
ID*Ev-Cv.SettleInc.Average
29647   0.0
29605   0.0
29602   8.0
29307   1.0
274811  1.0
274781  4.6
264141111.0
263941113.5
26381   0.0
248601111.2
2404011035.1
2346410 109.8
23120   1.1
22748110 7.3
17794   1.2
 2.14.63.23.0

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

Non-attorney Rating
(if applicable)

EvaluatorIDDateJudgeIDOvr.AverageReadComment
Other3016110/19/2014366511.0Read Comment
Litigant3014110/18/2014366511.0Read Comment
Other2964909/23/2014366511.0Read Comment
Other2964809/23/2014366511.0Read Comment
Court Staff2964509/23/20143665  Read Comment
Litigant2964209/23/2014366511.0Read Comment
Other2964009/23/20143665  Read Comment
Other2963909/23/2014366511.0Read Comment
Litigant2962809/22/2014366511.0Read Comment
Other2961209/21/2014366511.0Read Comment
Other2960809/21/2014366511.0Read Comment
Other2960609/21/2014366511.0Read Comment
Other2960409/21/2014366511.0Read Comment
Other2960309/21/20143665  Read Comment
Other2960109/21/20143665  Read Comment
Other2930909/07/2014366511.0Read Comment
Other2930609/07/20143665  Read Comment
Other2888808/19/2014366511.0Read Comment
Litigant2888608/19/2014366511.0Read Comment
Other2888408/19/2014366511.0Read Comment
Litigant2888308/19/2014366511.0Read Comment
Litigant2887008/19/201436651010.0Read Comment
Other2861008/05/2014366511.0Read Comment
Litigant2845207/29/2014366511.0Read Comment
Other2844907/29/2014366522.0Read Comment
Other2807807/15/2014366511.0Read Comment
Litigant2749606/17/2014366511.0Read Comment
Other2749406/17/2014366511.0Read Comment
Litigant2676405/04/2014366511.0Read Comment
Litigant2674905/03/2014366511.0Read Comment
Other2674705/03/2014366511.0Read Comment
Litigant2673205/02/20143665  Read Comment
Litigant2642304/09/2014366511.0Read Comment
Litigant2641704/08/20143665  Read Comment
Litigant2638704/07/20143665  Read Comment
Other2628804/02/2014366511.0Read Comment
Litigant2615703/24/2014366511.0Read Comment
Litigant2554203/08/2014366511.0Read Comment
Other2554103/08/2014366511.0Read Comment
Other2527002/18/20143665  Read Comment
Other2508602/01/20143665  Read Comment
Litigant2486301/10/2014366511.0Read Comment
Litigant2486101/10/2014366511.0Read Comment
Other2485801/10/2014366511.0Read Comment
Other2485701/10/2014366511.0Read Comment
Litigant2485601/10/2014366511.0Read Comment
Litigant2467212/19/20133665  Read Comment
Other2411011/07/2013366511.0Read Comment
Litigant2403411/04/20133665  Read Comment
Court Staff2383210/24/20133665  Read Comment
Other2383110/24/20133665  Read Comment
Other2324109/11/20133665  Read Comment
Litigant2323909/11/20133665  Read Comment
Other2321109/09/20133665  Read Comment
Litigant2318709/05/20133665  Read Comment
Other2318509/05/20133665  Read Comment
Other2313609/02/20133665  Read Comment
Litigant2313509/02/20133665  Read Comment
Litigant2313409/02/20133665  Read Comment
Litigant2311908/31/2013366511.0Read Comment
Other2186906/01/20133665  Read Comment
Other2133804/26/2013366511.0Read Comment
Other2003402/11/2013366511.0Read Comment
Other1769509/25/201236651010.0Read Comment
Other1181209/08/2011366511.0Read Comment
Category Average   1.51.5