Hon. Echo Ryan See Rating Details
Magistrate Judge
County Court
Arapahoe County
18th Judicial District
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.1 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Echo Ryan


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CO624
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I’ve dealt with several magistrates and judges over the years and I have to honestly say that this “judge” by far is the worst! She makes a decision on your case either by the attorney she likes the most or the friends she has worked with in the past on the first 5 minutes of court procedures starting. She doesn’t care and it shows. Her entitlement reeks throughout her long winded speeches and her eye rolls as you testify. She allows witnesses to be badgered on the stand and has been bold enough to rule against a domestic violence survivor, forcing said victim to send her children to the father, although father pled guilty to child abuse, child endangerment and malicious intent. She is possibly the worst type of judge to be put into a position like she’s in. Maybe they do things like this in Iowa (where she’s from), but to purposely put children in danger is absurd to do here in Colorado. As my attorney said, she’s absolutely nuts!

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CO607
Rating:1.2
Comments:
ECHO= truly lives up to her Greek Mythological name!!!! Know your due process rights, as she practices ABOVE The Supremacy Clause and is incompetent of C.R.C.P 16.2 et seq. Why she’s a family law practitioner comes only with her white privilege and at-large corruption in the 18th Judicial District Court (Arapahoe County). It was no surprise that she was RECUSED 10/26/2020 AFTER issuing an UNCONSTITUTIONAL (emphasis) INVALID Decree & APR and Child Support Orders (with notice to Third Party Intervenor) and after moving for change of judge and fraud on the court motions prior to appeal that ECHO willfully denied timely reopen (C.R.C.P 16.2(e)(10) ) motion 9/9/2020 (same day the ASSIGNED magistrate judge (Touissant) was appointed by the Governor) …. Made both complaints to OARC & CCJD RFE pursuant to 48 C.J.C. Judges § 47…. I’m hoping this “Karen” within Kolorado Kourts is debarred… Certainly my/ my son’s case will ECHO for years to come and how/why TITLE XV KEEPING CHILDREN SAFE FROM FAMILY VIOLENCE is necessary with consideration of this clothed ACTOR!

Court Staff

Comment #: CO585
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
When seeking justice, we expect our judicial system to make decisions based on facts. Unfortunately, this is not always the case. The untoward reality of unfair judges is that sometimes facts are overlooked, and justice is not served. In the case essential facts are often overlooked in the name of moving her agenda forward, which results in a miscarriage of justice. She is clearly and overtly swayed by one side's arguments while almost wholly disregarding the opposition. She does not allow both sides an equal opportunity to submit and present their evidence, leading to inconsistencies with her rulings and making her a horrible practitioner of the law.

Other

Comment #: CO584
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
She is not a fair judge and she clearly gives whoever the petitioner everything and anything because she don’t want look like she made the wrong decision from the beginning to the end she covers up her words in transcripts and orders and over rules everything even when the other party admits to everything and still gives petitioner everything as desired without really looking into everything presented and is obviously there in front of her!!