Hon. R. Michael Mullins See Rating Details
District Judge
District Court
Denver County
2nd Judicial District
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.2 - 4 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. R. Michael Mullins


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CO131
Rating:3.5
Comments:
Bizarre rulings. Filed a motion for default judgment. He took our requested damages and divided in half, and then only gave us 50% of the damages we asked for. No explanation whatsoever as to why this was done. He also takes forever to rule on motions, its not uncommon to show up on the day of trial and having to ask if he is ever going to rule on your discovery motion or motion for summary judgment. His normal response will be "oh yeah, I forgot, its denied." No further explanation given.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CO43
Rating:2.9
Comments:
I continually had the feeling he hadn't read the briefs. Rulings were bizarre.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CO30
Rating:3.0
Comments:
The previous assessment regarding his ruling on pre-trial motions is correct. Hopefully he will be more effective on the criminal docket where he is now, and retire before he moves back to the civil docket.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CO13
Rating:3.6
Comments:
This judge fails to rule on motions - by ignoring them. He acts like the case file is utterly foreign to him, and fails to understand basic concepts like standing.