Hon. Randall C. Arp See Rating Details
District Judge
District Court
Jefferson County
1st Judicial District
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Randall C. Arp


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CO210
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Arp does not care about what is best for children. He refused to hear testimony about child abuse, documented through Human Services, instead believing that he knew everything about the child abuse. He chose to give 50% custody to the abuser, seeming to think that it is better to split the children between both parents than to look at who was the more fit parent. In his courtroom, the men had more speaking time and he chastised the women. The father merely had to express the intent to parent for Judge Arp to award him 50% custody, despite the documented history of child abuse. Judge Arp forced my ex and I into mediation -- which, after the fact, I learned is illegal in this state in cases of child abuse and domestic violence.

Litigant

Comment #: CO201
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge is very gender biased against women. he has a poor understanding of domestic violence and child abuse.