Hon. Julie Hoskins See Rating Details
District Judge
District Court
Weld County
19th Judicial District
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Julie Hoskins


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CO221
Rating:2.0
Comments:
She was horrible! Had absolutely no knowledge of the law or what has been happening in the industry. Even admitted on the stand of not knowing anything of our constitutional law. She also allowed opposing counsel to say and submit as evidence anything they wanted. When it was my turn, she refused to allow my attorney to even question me. She let him ask me my name and that was it. She also refused to allow us to submit ANY evidence pertaining to my case. At one point I did inform her that I had never been given my right to due process amd this was my last chance to have that. She didnt care nor did she allow me any due process. Obviously she ruled in opposing councils favor. She was the most blatantly biased judge I have ever seen...