"The Robing Room: CT State Judges

Hon. Julia L. Aurigemma	See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge District Court
Middlesex County	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 3.3 - 4 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 3 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Julia L. Aurigemma

Comments

Litigant

Comment #: CT611
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge Aurigemma = awefull experience. She exhibits bias and jumps to conclusions before listening and taking the time to review the case facts carefully. Not a good reflection on CT's judicial system.

Court Staff

Comment #: CT588
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Aurigemma should be remove ASAP….
Before i could explain the situation & even have proof. Aurigemma already had made her mind to deny the case. In favor of these corrupt thugs junk debt buyers.. Extremely rude. Don’t follow the law & rights but agrees with non-smart so called lawyers.. New Britain court, from the rude clerks to the rude Aurigemma need to be remove & she needs to retire ASAP They don’t even practice our rights!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CT567
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Can't be bothered with the facts of the case. Makes wanton determinations without regard to the facts. Should be removed from bench as a threat to civil and constitutional rights.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CT556
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Extremely biased in favor of the plaintiff. Plainly a lawyer to stupid to make a living in private practice so she joined the Democratic Party and got a judgeship. Clearly unqualified and totally biased against civil defendants.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CT512
Rating:1.2

Comments:
Judge Aurigemma is beset by the disease of cognitive dissidence. She makes a conclusion and then makes up facts to support her decision.

In one case, she claimed the P did not sign the contract and the D(s) had. In fact the opposite was true. When the actual facts were pointed out to her repeatedly, she only restated her earlier conclusion.

Aurigemma is hot-headed. In one case I reviewed, an appellate appeal was filed and Aurigemma then dismissed the appeal on the Superior Court docket. Of course she had no authority to rule as such, but the fact that she actually tried to dismiss an appellate appeal goes to show her total misunderstanding of the law.

Aurigemma should be dismissed from the bench.

Litigant

Comment #: CT133
Rating:1.0

Comments:
She may have been a good judge in the past. However, she lacks the temperament to be a judge. She has open contempt for litigants. Disregards the law.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CT13
Rating:9.9

Comments:
A judge that is wiling to make a decision and sort the wheat from the chaff.