"The Robing Room: CT State Judges

Hon. Edward S. Domnarski	See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge District Court
Middlesex County	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 3.1 - 8 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: - 0 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Edward S. Domnarski

Comments

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CT651
Rating:1.0

Comments:
[Redacted by Ed.] when you file a motion for disqualification, he refused to allow another judge to rule on the motion denies a due process and equal protection of the law.
should be disqualified and disbarred at the same time.
If you have Foreclosure case with the Bank of New York Mellon, you are entitled to keep your house because the Bank of New York Mellon is a Facetious name of the Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and they cannot file a lawsuit at the state of Connecticut under a facetious name they must file it under the corporation register name.
and they also are not registered at the secretary of the state of Connecticut they don't have a certification to conduct business and to practice law in the state of Connecticut.
The case system in the state of Connecticut a covering for the Bank of New York Mellon and refusing to acknowledge that they are facetious name of an entity.
For and don't complain with the book of law and the rules of law at the state of Connecticut for the sick of foreclosure liability.
All against the law. Judge Edward S. Domnarski is the worst Judge in the middlxess country of Middletown Connecticut.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CT622
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Extremely biased against the self-represented. Sat through a collection case cited here and the judge is definiately stupid, biased, ignornant, and totally incompetent. Like the other not says, he should be disbarred.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CT597
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Sat throught a collection case. This judge is biased, stpid,moronic clown. He let the plaintiff, a medical provider, estblish a case with no testimoney that the work was ever done, no expert witness, and no records. Gives new dimension to the definition of a kangaroo court. The plaintiff's attorney, a friend of the judge could do no wrong. I have never seen such a travesty as was done in this case and I have been trying cases in the state and federal courts for over 50 years.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CT590
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Biased, stupid, ignorant, does not know the law of evidence, a law school flunkie, nor the that of the qualifications of an expert witness. Should be disbarred.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CT566
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Gives new dimension to the definition of being rail roaded. A typical lawyer who is to stupid to be sucessful in the private sector so he bought himself a judgeship.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CT555
Rating:1.0

Comments:
He has never read Richardson on Evidence. Lets a layman testify as an expert with no formal education and lets plaintiff prove case with no evidence that the work was ever performed. He runs a kangaroo Court and should be disbarred.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CT500
Rating:9.7

Comments:
A lawyer's judge. A bit more formal than most, but does his job accurately and with diligence. He keeps control of his courtroom.

If you hit the points required to win, you are going to win. While he dots the "i"s and crosses the "t"s, he runs a tight ship and you get the expected result with a good explanation.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CT400
Rating:9.3

Comments:
He is a lawyer's trial judge. He prefers a formal courtroom-and if you don't know how to do it by the book, you will be in deep trouble (and probably be unable to recover). He is VERY careful and methodical. While you may not agree with his decision, he will have researched it carefully. If you prove your case, you win. If you don't you lose. Not a bad trait in a judge.