Hon. Stephen F. Frazzini See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
District Court
Hartford County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   10.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Stephen F. Frazzini


Comments


Court Staff

Comment #: CT183
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Frazzini has demonstrated that his mental capacities have failed. He can't explain why everyone on the FOY case is an AFCC member....including himself. The legislature had to remind him that he is a card carrying member of the union of child traffickers. Old bird can't spell First Amendment or prior restraint and is oblivious to the organization that trafficks children for legal fees....yes this old bird probably likes little boys too....another danger to society in a black robe.

Court Staff

Comment #: CT178
Rating:1.0
Comments:
The old bird showed his incompetence and deteriorating brain functions in his reappointment hearing before the judicial stooge committee. The old boy spilled his drool cup a few time in attempting to avoid the obvious questions. He revealed that he was 'mentored' by the evil witch Lynda Munro. Proof that cancer spreads among the judges. Now the silliness of the Foy case is revealed, a nut for a judge and the Constitution goes out the window. An inbred, incompetent old man who lost grasp on reality, pretending to be an instrument of rule of law and element of justice, put back on the bench to fester for another term and destroy the elements of liberty. Connecticut, a place where liberty goes to die.

Litigant

Comment #: CT59
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Fazzini completely ignored ongoing violations of orders in my case, and frequent reports of alienation and abuse of my sons. He issued a capias against me, forcing me to liquidate my sons' college funds to pay for a GAL who did no work of any kind on my case and who never once submitted a bill explaining what he should be paid for.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CT9
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Mild, low key temperment. Very fair.