Hon. Stephen F. Frazzini See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
District Court
Hartford County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   5.5 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Please type what you see below:


What others have said about Hon. Stephen F. Frazzini


Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: CT323
Takes care of his cronies in the AFCC. Rubber stamps everything they want. Biased and incompetent. Lets GALs do the work for him. Lazy, does not listen to witnesses and reads the New York Times from the bench during cases.

Court Staff

Comment #: CT178
The old bird showed his incompetence and deteriorating brain functions in his reappointment hearing before the judicial stooge committee. The old boy spilled his drool cup a few time in attempting to avoid the obvious questions. He revealed that he was 'mentored' by the evil witch Lynda Munro. Proof that cancer spreads among the judges. Now the silliness of the Foy case is revealed, a nut for a judge and the Constitution goes out the window. An inbred, incompetent old man who lost grasp on reality, pretending to be an instrument of rule of law and element of justice, put back on the bench to fester for another term and destroy the elements of liberty. Connecticut, a place where liberty goes to die.


Comment #: CT59
Judge Fazzini completely ignored ongoing violations of orders in my case, and frequent reports of alienation and abuse of my sons. He issued a capias against me, forcing me to liquidate my sons' college funds to pay for a GAL who did no work of any kind on my case and who never once submitted a bill explaining what he should be paid for.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CT9
Mild, low key temperment. Very fair.