Hon. Corinne L. Klatt See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
District Court
Fairfield County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.6 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   2.0 - 5 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Corinne L. Klatt


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CT419
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She is a disgrace as a judge and lowers the bar for those others who may make a mistake from time to time, but do seem to try to do their job with fairness. Sick that she was made a judge given her poor performance as prosecutor, but worse that she was send through a 2nd time for another term. Sit in her courtoom just a little while, it won't take long to hear her own staff talk about how stupid she is. One staffer even told me how Klatt's husband committed suicide years ago and so maybe she should get some help to deal with that.

Litigant

Comment #: CT379
Rating:9.0
Comments:
Had a good court demeanor. Was fair and followed the law.

Court Staff

Comment #: CT373
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This Judge needs to be removed from the bench. She is unstable and has no sense of compassion for anyone.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CT274
Rating:2.1
Comments:
My daughter received a letter.from the Chief State's Attorney's Office that she was a victim.of a rape. My grandson was the DNA evidence proven in Superior Court. Then State's Attonries John Connolly and Corrine Klatt both refused to prosecute my daughter and grandson's case. We all know how John Connolly handled cases... What we want to know is why Corrine Klatt wasn't disbarred and arrested for her part. We were shocked and appalled that Corrine Klatt was promoted to a Judge after all her inappropriate and criminal behaviors along with John Connolly since she was his assistant. As a woman she should be in prison for refusing to prosecute a rape case of a child. We have a broken judicial system.

Litigant

Comment #: CT85
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Klatt is a disgrace to the judicial system. SHe has complete disregard to the laws. She is biased and aligns herself with attorneys and GAL's who she socializes with. Her actions on the bench are offensive and criminal towards pro se litigants. She must be removed.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CT73
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She needs to be removed or switched to motor vehicle court. Very rude, yells, short temper, relies on GAL who are crooked . If you are not wealthy...you will be thrown to the wolves. head of the pack is KLATT

Probation or Pretrial Officer

Comment #: CT72
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Unprofessional. Yells at litigants. Very rude and condescending to pro se parties. Cant make a decision on her own. Relies on her relationships with GAL that are biased and prejudicial.