Hon. Leslie I. Olear See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
District Court
Hartford County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   7.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Leslie I. Olear


Comments


Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: CT140
Rating:1.0
Comments:
A person of such demonstrative failure of juris prudence as Olear is proof positive that the Connecticut Judiciary is a fallacy. How a nomination and selection criteria of any merit could allow such incompetence to ascend to the bench is beyond understanding. The mark of an uncivilized society. Perks, favors, kickbacks, privilege all at the expense of children, families, hard earned savings. In a twisted strange way, the system worked a little bit. She pushed the limits of judicial impropriety to the point that the people's representatives had to check it. A House vote brought her down, completely. Banished to juvenile court to protect the society from further incompetence.

Litigant

Comment #: CT136
Rating:7.0
Comments:
I found Judge Olear to have good intentions and to try her best to produce fair rulings. Her thought processes were logical and in most occasions can produce a fair judgment. However, she does have a weakness that some lawyers and litigants (that play the victim) are able to exploit which unfortunately produces improper rulings. It’s not that Judge Olear naively trusts everyone, but she does give lawyers the benefit of the doubt of good intentions and gives victims benefit of the doubt of their victimization. In the case of lawyers, her naivety of trusting their good intentions produces pathetic rulings when the lawyer does not have good intentions. In the case of litigants claiming to be victims, even though she may not believe them, but does not know for sure, she plays it safe and gives the victim the benefit of the doubt which can also produce unfair rulings. I believe this bias is a part of her personality and a lawyer who can pick up on this would be in a position to manipulate a favorable ruling.