Hon. Jane B. Emons See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge
District Court
Fairfield County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   5.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Jane B. Emons


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CT142
Rating:1.0
Comments:
With 85 percent pro se, Judge Emons is not even remotely kind to this majority. Her constant status conferences for attorneys, many in her chambers illegally robs children's legal guardians from their entire parenting process. Don't ever agree to GAL or AMC and insist of list of "vendors" if you are ordered for schedulers or other nonsense.

Litigant

Comment #: CT89
Rating:4.0
Comments:
Smart, but tends to hip shoot. "Cuts to the chase" pre-maturely and renders uninformed decisions. Court congestion may force some of this behavior, but she is as responsible as anybody for the backlog by kowtowing to the regulars. Openly hostile to pro se litigants.

Litigant

Comment #: CT48
Rating:10.0
Comments:
She is the best judge in Stamford. She solves very difficult problems with thoughtfulness. She goes above and beyond to make up for the difficult process set up by the legislature to address family matters. She is able to see through the lies and deceit prevalent in family matters. She renders fair and thorough decisions that stand up to the appeals process.