Hon. Florence Pan See Rating Details
Judge
Superior

See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.3 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Florence Pan


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: DC576
Rating:1.0
Comments:
When comparing her to Judge Jose Lopez, they are the same. Sloppy and irresponsible. Where do they find these incompetent people from. She has zero skills in scholarship and handling complex litigation. For pre-trial matters, she rushes through motions to dismiss to get them off her desk with no thought on how her decision impacts others. Most rulings are pro employer and pro government. Very uneven in rulings. I filed a motion to amend the complaint. The complaint had substantive changes to correct facts. She summarily denied the motion with no thought about facts needing to be updated. She certainly misrepresented her credentials to get on this court. She has no business being a judge.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: DC566
Rating:1.7
Comments:
Absolutely one of the worst judges on the bench. She is sloppy in her rulings favoring the government most of the time when they are dead wrong. The government can pull the wool over her eyes every time. She has no skill in sifting through facts. She took a simple motion to amend the pleadings, which was an easy motion to grant because it included updated corrections to the facts. She denied it. She is a real bozo. Not sure how she got on the bench. She is definitely a reason not to appoint Asian Americans to the bench just because they are a minority. She totally lacks scholarship and a good handle of the law.