"The Robing Room: DC State Judges

Hon. Laura A. Cordero	See Rating Details
Judge Superior
	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 2.6 - 2 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: - 0 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Laura A. Cordero

Comments

Other

Comment #: DC588
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Cordero did not do her due diligence to review the submitted evidence and listen to the arguments of both sides with no bias. And then she issued summary judgement taking the false narrative of the plaintiff which I believe to be wrong. The case was about MY faith, MY right to believe so Judge Cordero should NOT choose sides in what is a matter of religious doctrine or polity. But she did.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: DC587
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge Cordero did not do her due diligence to review the submitted evidence and listen to the arguments of both sides with no bias. And then she issued summary judgement taking the false narrative of the plaintiff which I believe to be wrong. The case was about MY faith, MY right to believe so Judge Cordero should NOT choose sides in what is a matter of religious doctrine or polity. But she did.

Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: DC526
Rating:4.1

Comments:
She voluntarily applied to be a judge. She should come to work with a smile and professional demeanor. She is skewed in favor of Plaintiffs and arrives at decisions before heading both sides. She treats new attorneys poorly.

Litigant

Comment #: DC292
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
not very pleasant. interrupts a lot. knows the rules and the law but has zero sympathy for anyone and i think judges should be human, not robots. she is too desensitized.