Hon. Judith N. Macaluso See Rating Details
Judge
Superior

See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   6.9 - 4 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Judith N. Macaluso


Comments


Other

Comment #: DC325
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
She recently got overturned on a very simple and elementary issue in a landlord-tenant case regarding retaliation. The court of appeals decision even implied as much. You would think, based on her age and the way she carries herself, that she would be more intellectually curious but that isn't so. Her decision in the case was obviously made due to her unwillingness to give the tenant a fair shake. Glad that the tenant was represented by a large, prestigious law firm on a pro bono basis, as they really taught her a lesson.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: DC297
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
very long winded. does not run a calendar efficiently. i agree that she tries to do the right thing when presented with a tough call but it would be easier if she just read the controlling case law and the briefs submitted by both sides. each case is different and she is often convinced that she should treat all of them the same. not a mean lady but not necessarily pleasant either. not one of the better ones.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: DC274
Rating:5.4
Comments:
Had a couple cases with Judge Macaluso. She seems to try to do the right thing, but she also was completely wrong on the law and was unfair to one side in her rulings. Neither case made it to trial as we settled rather than take chances with her. She is far from the worst judge in D.C. but I prefer to not appear in her courtroom.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: DC272
Rating:4.5
Comments:
It is better to be a civil litigation defendant before her than it is to be a plaintiff. This could be explained by the fact that her son is a defense lawyer for a car insurance company. She readily accepts the position of defendants with regard to discovery matters and defensive motions. If you are a plaintiff you will have an uphill battle. Hiking boots are recommended.

Litigant

Comment #: DC227
Rating:1.0
Comments:
If not listening to multitude of witnesses and making up her mind before the case begins constitutes a great judge- so be it! This woman has very little experience and an attorney and yet had a REPUBLICAN senate nominate her for this role. My research uncovered the fact that her only litigation experience noted was representing a truck driver on a $3,000 claim. She is horrible and has psychological issues. I think misogynist would be accurate. The other comments here are laughable. Women litigants, be warned, especially if you are attractive. I'm not kidding.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: DC110
Rating:7.8
Comments:
Judge Macaluso is fair. She has the proper judicial temperament.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: DC103
Rating:9.7
Comments:
An outstanding judge in every respect. She possesses a unique combination of respect towards all parties and attorneys, a thorough knowledge of the law and an ability to see that justice is done.