Hon. Ronald P. Wertheim See Rating Details
Senior Judge
Superior

See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Ronald P. Wertheim


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: DC440
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This Judge violated my Due Process when he initially wrote an Order denying a TRO filed by a White, racist, landlord, named Thomas Theodore Androus. Mr. Androus is a landlord who was sued for offering bribes to tenants to get them out of a building. He went before Wertheim and made false statements. The Judge initially denied the request. Then later granted it. In either case I was not present to defend myself. After I filed a complaint with the Judicial Committee, Wertheim sunmitted an Order putting me in a
" False Light." He was either lazy/negigent,racist/discrimination and or possibly influenced by Androus in some other manner. In any event, he did not do his job. If he would dispense justice in the absence of a lawyer in a TRO, what is he doing to citizens who are not lawyers?

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: DC183
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Understands the law. Is even handed, and respects the decisions of people who cannot speak for themselves.