Hon. Fern Flanagan Saddler See Rating Details
Judge
Superior

See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.2 - 4 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Fern Flanagan Saddler


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: DC647
Rating:2.4
Comments:
In my experience, Judge Saddler was even-tempered enough, but lazy and above all, dumb as a rock. You have no idea how she will rule on motions or at trial (for example on rules of evidence) because she doesn't know what she is doing. She will mouth some legal principle and then totally misapply it.

She really makes you wonder not only how she became a judge, but how she passed the bar exam

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: DC528
Rating:1.6
Comments:
Judge Saddler is one of the worst judges on the DC bench. It one thing to be rude, nasty, and disrecptful to the defense bar in your courtroom. It’s a different thing to be not bright, intellectually. It’s an entirely different (and disastrous) to be both, which Judge Saddler is. She is one of the rudest people I’ve ever encountered. On top of the general disrespect she shows, she has no clue what she’s doing on the bench. There is a reason the chief judge doesn’t trust her to handle felony matters in DC (she’d likely not be able to comprehend the complexity of the litigation that is currently being undertaken in the felony courts of DC). Judge Fern Saddler has no business sitting on the bench of any jurisdiction.

Litigant

Comment #: DC520
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This Judge should be criminally charged for her behavior. Judge Saddler has deliberately and intentionally conspired with the AAG to keep children in the foster care system. This Judge should had vacated an order after she left out all defendants evidence in the finding of fact and conclusion of law. This Judge has deliberately allow the system to destroyed many children. She need to be remove from the bench.

Litigant

Comment #: DC259
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This is judge is slanted toward female litigants, even if the litigant's case has no merit. She threatened to hold mysefl and a co-respondent in contempt, when the petitioner was the one having a Jerry Springer moment. She is unable to make difficult decision, especially when the petitioner is female, and the obvious decision would be unfavorable to the female. If you are a male who is before her on a civil matter, request another judget, post haste.