Hon. Marisa Demeo See Rating Details
Judge
Superior

See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Marisa Demeo


Comments


Prosecutor

Comment #: DC288
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
very very sharp. lays out her findings with great detail and pretty much always gets it right. i dont think her reversal rate will be high and she is definitely going places, maybe district court. shes now on misdemeanor calendars but that wont be for long-far too bright. however, stoic to a fault. not very pleasant. takes personal offense to things that arent personal. she tattles on attorneys a lot by calling back to the office for petty things, something judges shouldnt waste time doing. every once in awhile a little bit of of ghetto vernacular will creep out when she gets heated. she finds defendants guilty when she should but then wont sentence them in a fashion that makes a difference. she tends to let more affluent defendants off easier which isnt fair to minority/poorer defendants-and this is coming from a prosecutor. i suppose a judge's friendliness shouldnt matter but when you're frequently before her, it would be nice if she wasnt so robotic. in this jurisdiction, however, her intelligence is refreshing.