Hon. Mark J. Hill See Rating Details

Circuit Court
Lake County
5th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.5 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Mark J. Hill


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: FL3420
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Ignored all testimony in divorce case. Gave ownership of guns to respondent with an active injunction in place for domestic violence. Ignored monthly medical costs for petitioner with a debilitating chronic illness and stated drugs to control the disease were "elected" although they were prescribed as a last ditch effort by a neurologist. Ignored expert testimony by two physicians. Awarded alimony despite no need being presented in court. Divided federally protected VA benefits despite federal law stating it was not alloed. Benefits were for injuries incurred prior to marriage. Penalized petitioner for large tax debt on funds paid as partial settlement to respondent although he ordered such funds to be paid from the specific account he stipulated in his own court order! There is no justice with this man. I hope he can look at himself in the mirror.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL1102
Rating:2.5
Comments:
Should not be on the bench.