Hon. Meenu Sasser See Rating Details

Circuit Court
Palm Beach County
15th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.2 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Meenu Sasser


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: FL6972
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She should not be on the bench. She is unstable. She doesn't abide by the U.S. Constitution when it comes to the right to fair access to courts. She should not have been allowed to judge foreclosure cases when she owns so much stock in the mortgage cos.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL6944
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Worst state court judge I have seen in almost a half decade of practice and I set a low bar because they are judges with less experience as a lawyer than myself. Most disappointing is angry nasty demeanor that makes you question continuing in the practice of law even as an excellent lawyer with no discipline history for almost half a decade. Client was in fear of this judge and she loves dismissals rather than merits when pleadings are to be taken as true at the dismissal stage.She caused multiple appeals and ruined lives. She an embarrassment to the profession showing how political it truly is in the Courts at the local level.Her husband is a high paid divorce lawyer,yuk, so she can live well on a government job as a public servant known as the "rocket". Law is supposed to be slow and methodical not a rocket docket especially when people are losing their homes. Now shes sick with cancer.She is not physically or mentally fit for the job. She lost a child to alleged hospital negligence and wouldn't recuse herself when the hospital was before her on another matter. Her karma is real bad. I tell clients I cant sue in her court and refer them out which hurts injured clients, lawyers, and the profession. The biggest cigarette plaintiffs firm in south Florida agrees on this. Google judge Sasser removed from smokers case due to admitted bias. Considered early retirement rather than face this judge at 8am. Decided to rely on Federal practice and quit appearing in state court as better option.They have better parking and start at 9:30 and you wont get a random assignment of Judge Sasser because they wont have her neither will the 4th DCA appeal Court. Shes stuck in state until termed out or beaten.

Litigant

Comment #: FL6851
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I did not get a fair hearing. The plaintiff got summary judgement and damages and now I AM IN DEBT for a loan I RECEIVED nothing for. The fact that the papers were not equitable and the fact that the PLAINTIFF did not provide evidence of true consideration exchange did not matter. THE consideration was just an affidavit, I got no benefit AND the plaintiff will get double recovery (my payments PLUS the proceeds of the property sale with a GAIN to boot). I GOT SCREWED. I agree with Comment #: FL6064; a disgrace.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: FL6597
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Refused to disqualify herself but after the third disqualification she had no option. Violates people’s constitutional rights and even her own published rules. She is very well connected and uses her connections to abuse the system and further criminal acts.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL6064
Rating:1.5
Comments:
A disgrace. Palpably biased and ignorant of the basic rules of evidence. Should not be on the bench.

Litigant

Comment #: FL6045
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This judge is intellectually dishonest. Just look at how many federal lawsuits she has... Lots of people complaining about the same thing. She knowingly and intentionally aided and abetted in the fraudulent conveyance of my property under the "color of law". Lender sworn verification stated that I owed accelerated balance of $16,489.49. I paid $24,500. She still gave my property away finding a "discount". Judgment entered in my absentia. No court reporter present. By the way, no financial statements were entered to support her "judgment" (I have a certified copies of the entire docket. I have her lying on the record several times. I can proof her lies. I also have her on record saying she'll help the lender and his lawyer on appeal.

I also have transcripts of Sasser complaining about her job. She hates it. Court reporter records speak for themselves.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: FL6044
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge is a crook. Talk about dishonesty! She knowingly and intentionally aided and abetted in the fraudulent conveyance of my property under the "color of law". Lender sworn verification stated that I owed accelerated balance of $16,489.49. I paid $24,500. She still gave my property away finding a "discount". Judgment entered in my absentia. No court reporter present. By the way, no financial statements were entered to support her "judgment" (I have a certified copies of the entire docket. I have her lying on the record several times. I can proof her lies. I also have her on record saying she'll help the lender and his lawyer on appeal.

I also have transcripts of Sasser complaining about her job. She hates it. Court reporter records speak for themselves.

Litigant

Comment #: FL6020
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Rules without evidence, extremely bias to the point that Sasser will put —on record— that she will protect the other side side on appeal. Failed to give me notice of trial and takes advantage of pro se litigants. She’s only interested in reducing her workload.