Hon. Barbara W. Bronis See Rating Details

Circuit Court
St. Lucie County
19th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.7 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   2.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Barbara W. Bronis


Comments


Court Staff

Comment #: FL3533
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Bronis is a "Bringer of Destruction" to families. She is sure to have her position within the family courts firmly established as that is the purpose of the family courts--destruction.

Other

Comment #: FL2955
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Bronis rules on facts and material evidence, despite the political climate. In my case she found for the petitioner. She seemed very even-tempered and empathetic. She is very good at time management. If I were a lawyer in front of Bronis, I wouldn't tap dance too much, because she has no patience for wasting time on a trial with a set end. Expert witnesses especially draw her attention and careful criticism. She has no trouble examining expert witnesses for pseudoscience and unfounded opinions. She does take a while with regard to her decisions, but she does take extremely detailed notes that are apparent and specifically mentioned in her judgements. Her judgements seem ironclad. She takes the Tate statute and lists what evidence applies to the decision point by point. All in all, an excellent judge.

Other

Comment #: FL2821
Rating:3.0
Comments:
Despite testimony which revealed marital assets depleted and reckless spending of them the judge took a non chalant attitude to the revelation and just looked at the ability of the "man" to pay even after testimony of the petitioner that her expenses were totally false. No questions to the petitioner Totally gender biased for the woman, next case!,,

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: FL2521
Rating:2.1
Comments:
Ask for her if you are a woman petitioner...you will win!!!

Other

Comment #: FL2520
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Ask for her if you are a woman petitioner...you will win!!!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL1806
Rating:3.4
Comments:
One word: Biased.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL665
Rating:5.8
Comments:
Practicing in her courtroom is like practicing in your grandma's kitchen. Her demeanor is excellent and she has a fairly decent grasp of the law. Procedurally, she really doesn't care what the rules are and tends to do what she wants to do regardless of the rules. She will let you argue your case but once she has ruled, it's over. Probably my most stringent criticism of her is that her courtroom tends to be somewhat of a do-nothing courtroom. It is very difficult to obtain a ruling out of her until the bitter end. Forget about temporary relief or emergency motions, they will not be heard unless someone is cutting their kid's head off. She also tends to be somewhat of a "split the baby judge." Overall, she appears to be afraid to make a decision until she is absolutely forced into it. Trial wise, she runs a decent trial and for the most part lets you present your case.