Hon. Lauren L. Brodie See Rating Details

Circuit Court
Collier County
20th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.7 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Please type what you see below:


What others have said about Hon. Lauren L. Brodie


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL5553
The judge routinely violates 18 usc 242, in so much as she uses the courts of chancery to deny people their 7th amendment rights to a fair trial when that same remedy is available in the criminal law. See Shoenthal v irving trust. She also issues issues prior restraints that violate the first amendment which are not narrowly tailored. See Carroll v princess anne, and new york times v united states. Be sure to be ready in advance for appellate review, as she'll grant the orders in absence of any evidence.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL5015
Worst judge I have ever appeared before

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL3424
This judge reads magazines during trials while experts testify. She has no care for court proceedings and is not prepared for trials. She has no ability or inclination to learn about the cases that come before her or the case law involved. Very poor civil judge.