Hon. Antonio Marin See Rating Details

Circuit Court
Miami-Dade County
11th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments




What others have said about Hon. Antonio Marin


Comments


Other

Comment #: FL5249
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Has been on the bench too long. No longer effective

Other

Comment #: FL5248
Rating:1.0
Comments:
HAS NO CLUE OF THE LAW, DOES NOT RESPECT DUE PROCESS, STATUS QUO ORDER BY HIM FOR BOTH PARTIES HAS NO MEANING, HE FAVOR'S PLANTIFF SIDE,DEFENDANTS TO HIM ARE GUILTY, DEFENDANTS TO HIM HAVE NOT CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. VERY RUDE, REPEATS THE SAME ALL THE TIME.

Other

Comment #: FL5122
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
You need to pull him from the bench!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL5007
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Agree with the other comments. Completely clueless. Has criminal background so no civil analytic skills at all. Appears to have no inclination to learn. Terrible, terrible disappointment. AGREE! DO NOT WALK IN WITHOUT A COURT REPORTER!!!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL3968
Rating:1.1
Comments:
I agree with the previous post,,,,I have worse things to say buy I'll keep it at that. Only to add, DO NOT WALK IN WITHOUT A COURT REPORTER!!!
He is now in the civil division, during motion calendar he hears one case at a time-everyone else is expected to wait outside----in my opinion, probably does not want people to hear or see what goes on with other litigants. Why the "closed door" policy?

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL3612
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Absolutely incompetent. Does not know or understand due process, let alone law. Doesn't read or understand what he read. No place to put him because he will be a problem in any division.