Hon. Mark J. Yerman See Rating Details

County Court
Citrus County
5th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 4 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Mark J. Yerman


Comments


Other

Comment #: FL6472
Rating:1.0
Comments:
The honorable goal is justice. Justice for all. People, creatures, situations. In the case of Soft Landings Parrot Rescue there was no justice. Most of all, no justice for the creatures in Ziggy's Haven. This doesn't stop here. All of the animals there and the property should have been subjected to evaluation. This is a pitiful and tragic outcome. There was no honor is ruling that the birds staying at Ziggy's was a "gift". That doesn't even make sense.

Other

Comment #: FL6469
Rating:1.0
Comments:
He is NOT an advocate for animal rights. He should be ashamed of his ruling against Soft Landings and for the abusers a Ziggys.

Other

Comment #: FL6376
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I am in a program kind of like drug court, the kind where you are basically set up to fail. Anyway Judge Yerman ask me a question expecting a different answer than the one I gave and kept challenging me to have a different answer; which I did not give. I felt like he was wanting me to say something that wasn't necessarily true. I had a good rapport with this judge up until this happened. I probably shot myself in the foot with the answer I gave. Only time will tell.

Other

Comment #: FL2973
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge does not listen to evidence. He makes up his mind without listening.

Other

Comment #: FL1850
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I HAVE LOST FAITH IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM DUE TO THIS MAN HELPING A WOMAN DEFRAUDING SECTION 8 BREAK IN, SQUAT FOR 7 MONTHS AND THEN DESTROY A MOBILE HOME.

THE OWNER NEVER GOT HIS DAY IN COURT NOR DID HE REC ANY NOTIFICATION OF A FEB 23 11 COURT DATE.