Hon. John Marshall Kest See Rating Details

Circuit Court
Orange County
9th Circuit
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.1 - 18 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. John Marshall Kest


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: FL8997
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This guy should not be on the bench. What will it takes to get him off the bench folks? He is toxic for our legal system.

Litigant

Comment #: FL8151
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I lost for words and don't believe Judge Kest is still on the bench.
His rulings are completely injustices.
Some action is needed to get this jerk off the bench.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: FL6942
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Kest is not a knowelegable judge but simply acts as a extra proscutor in the room. An examination of his sentencing histroy shows a significant diasparity in how he sentences minorities and less affluent defendants. He is a judge with a view of CJS born form the days of mass incarciration and selective prosecutions and becomes claer in his rulings and courtroom tactics to try and intimidate and scare defendants into resolving mattters in away that is not just.

The man should not be a judge if he will not be fair to all who are before him. A judge's job is not to asssit the staet or the defense but to be fair and just to all, no matter what result that may lead you to.
"the means do not justify the end"

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL6298
Rating:1.0
Comments:
He is in my opion garbage. In a minor case he would not put off while I was a witness in a trial at a major case. Finally he put it off after been ordered to I am told by Chief Justice. After that he did not not even listen or look at evidence and just ruled against me. At first did not even give me a chance to present my case until after my demand.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL6278
Rating:8.6
Comments:
Judge Kest is a really good judge. He is tough, and can sometimes rub lawyers the wrong way, but he is smart and works hard. He treats litigants fairly. He is more like a federal judge in his approach, procedures and rulings. Overall an excellent judge in civil.

Other

Comment #: FL5885
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Horrible, Marshall Kest coming from civil has little to no experience in criminal justice division. Kest is a loose canon. He over punishes and abuses his position and has no interest in being fair and using his position to make a difference. He is arrogant and thinks it's all about him. He has no respect for lawyers or his staff.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL5873
Rating:6.0
Comments:
Horrible temperament. Arrogant and condescending. While he is bright, and understands the law he is infected with "robe fever" to such a degree that he should step down from the bench. He no longer understands that cases are not about him.

Litigant

Comment #: FL5475
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
It is dishearten to have a person such as John Kest Marshall on the bench. He has demonstrated a total disregard for the Rule of Law and his incompetency has proven he does not give a damn about any truthfulness in our Justice system.

Judge Marshall knowingly aided Florida Mobster Alec Difrawi by denying JUSTICE to those Alec Difrawi dba Expand, Inc. sued over the years.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: FL5109
Rating:1.0
Comments:
below average ability to handle complex litigation does not treat lawyers with proper respect all around mediocre judge

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: FL5056
Rating:1.0
Comments:
very difficult complicates matters awful judge

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: FL5014
Rating:1.0
Comments:
he does not like to be questioned about his understanding of the law even when wrong he tossed an order back at me he didnt very bad judge get it right

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: FL4970
Rating:1.0
Comments:
this judge has very poor temperament and a very poor understanding of civil procedure all around awful on the bench

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: FL4917
Rating:1.0
Comments:
would not sign a simple stipulated order without a hearing a waste of time I rate him on the bottom of those judges in the 9th circuit

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: FL4904
Rating:1.0
Comments:
very poor temperament rate him low as a judge

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL4892
Rating:9.5
Comments:
Really bright, hard working judge. He follows his rules and if you deviate you will be held to it. But really isn't that what we want?

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: FL4637
Rating:1.0
Comments:
poor excuse for a judge try to avoid this judge waste of tome

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL4526
Rating:1.0
Comments:
POOR JUDGE WEAK ON THE LAW NEEDS TO BONE UP ON CIVIL PROCEDURE

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL4257
Rating:1.0
Comments:
totally unsuited to sit as a fair and impartial judge the worst in orange county florida

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL4172
Rating:1.0
Comments:
DOES NOT FOLLOW THE LAW THE WORST JUDGE OR DOES NOT KNOW THE LAW NEEDS TO GO INTO PRIVATE PRACTICE TO SEE WHAT LAWYERS WHO HAVE TO APPEAR IN FRONT OF PEOPLE LIKE HIM THINK THE LAWYERS I SPEAK TO HAVE A VERY LOW OPINION OF THIS GUY '

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL4149
Rating:1.0
Comments:
terrible judge try to avoid this judge very limited legal knowledge and it is obvious I avoid him and send someone else rate him at the bottom

Litigant

Comment #: FL3684
Rating:1.0
Comments:
In the case of Alec Difrawi dba Three Star Media dba Expand Inc. dba Softrock, Inc., case # 2013-CA-004602-O vs Investigative Reporter Les Henderson, Judge John Kest Marshall is now the designated Judge that is handling Alec Difrawi lawsuits @ the 9th Circuit Courthouse.

From an outside observer, it appears like Judge Marshall is aiding Mr. Difrawi.

Most damaging evidence presented by Defendant Les Henderson to the Court including Alec difrawi past business practices of erecting websites to destroy his critics were consider non-admissible for whatever reasons or law the Judge could find.

These same evidence and exhibits were presented to the Federal Court - Middle District of Florida Case #6:2007cv01854 and Case # 6:2007cr1854, lawsuits filed by Alec Difrawi against Mr. Henderson and others. Federal Judge Karla R. Spauling and Judge Anne C. Conway reviewed the evidence presented by Mr. Henderson and dismissed Alec Difrawi lawsuit as bogus and frivolous.

Now Alec Difrawi feels untouchable because Judge John Kest Marshall and the legal system we turn to for justice are now the very ones protecting Alec Difrawi.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: FL3016
Rating:9.3
Comments:
A very fair and very appropriate judge. He is the type of judge we should have in every division. Some people think he's overly strict, but in reality he treats people fairly, rules on matters, has reasonable rules for his division, and is smart. What more can you ask of a judge?

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: FL2428
Rating:9.7
Comments:
Very fair judge and treats litigants with professionalism and respect